Con Law

No, the NY monopoly was unconstitutional under the supremacy clause. Commerce is defined broadly here.

Can Congress suppress a monopoly? No. Commerce is defined as excluding the manufacturing.

Congress cannot regulate interstate commerce of goods produced using child labor. Again, manufacturing is not commerce.

Commerce now includes power to regulate manufacturing as long as the activity substantially affects interstate commerce

Established minimum wage. Congress can now forbid shipment of goods in interstate commerce if the employees are paid less than minimum wage.

Congress can regulate any activity that may have an indirect effect on interstate commerce. Even if not technically commerce or interstate.

Commerce now includes power to prohibit racial discrimination in public places as long as activity has direct and substantial effect.

Commerce is now limited to 1. The channels of interstate commerce, 2. Instrumentalities, things and persons in interstate commerce, and 3. C

Commerce extends to regulate marijuana. Home consumption has an effect on supply and demand

This established that Congress may place conditions that must be met on grants to state and local governments.

Congress reserves the constitutional right to use to power to tax in the individual mandate.

States may regulate commerce that is local in nature and those which did not require uniformity Congress.

A power that belongs to both Federal and State

Only Congress may regulate interstate commerce (Commerce is exclusive)

States get to regulate intrastate and Federal regulates interstate.

Congress may regulate those things that require national uniformity.

Under the commerce clause, a state law that puts significant burden on interstate commerce in in violation.

State courts are bound by the Constitution and all federal laws in pursuance thereof.

State courts are bound by the constitution AND the Supreme Court of the U.S. gets to determine what the interpretation of the Constitution i

Alabama city did violate the 15th amendment by denying all but a handful of Blacks from voting by redrawing the city lines in a 28 sided way

Georgia violated the 14th amendment by unequally distributing the populace in each district so that some votes counted more than others. Rep

The Court struck down state senate inequality, basing their decision on the principle of "one person, one vote."

Despite heavy evidence supporting that race was a factor in the drawing of North Carolina’s districts, race was NOT the PRIMARY factor.

Political Gerrymandering in nonjusticable because there is still not a standard for adjudicating the claims. Fairness cannot be determined b